The Critical Issues in 2025 Surrounding FOIA Requests for Police Body-Worn Camera Footage in the United States: Focusing on Video Redaction and the Benefits of Third-Party Service Providers
In today's era of heightened scrutiny of law enforcement, video evidence has become increasingly crucial in ensuring accountability and transparency. A staggering 80% of all criminal offenses recorded in the US involve video or audio evidence, underscoring the growing importance of visual documentation in the justice system. One significant source of such evidence is police body-worn cameras (BWCs), which capture firsthand accounts of law enforcement interactions. However, the release of BWC footage under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) presents unique challenges, particularly concerning the privacy of individuals captured in the recordings. This white paper delves into the critical issues surrounding FOIA requests for police BWC footage, focusing on the legal landscape in each state, the crucial role of video redaction, and the cost-effectiveness of employing third-party redaction services.
A Brief History of BWCs and FOIA
The adoption of BWCs by law enforcement agencies across the United States has been a relatively recent phenomenon, gaining momentum in the early 2010s. Driven by concerns about police misconduct and the need for greater transparency, BWCs were seen as a tool to improve accountability and enhance public trust. However, the release of BWC footage has raised concerns about privacy and the potential for sensitive information to be publicly disseminated.
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), enacted in 1966, has been instrumental in guaranteeing public access to government records. Over the years, FOIA legislation has evolved to address new technologies and the changing landscape of information access. With the rise of BWCs, FOIA has become increasingly relevant in balancing the public's right to know with the need to protect individual privacy.
FOIA Requests for Police BWC Footage: An Overview
Increased public scrutiny of law enforcement and growing demands for accountability have led to a surge in FOIA requests for police BWC footage. This footage can provide valuable evidence in criminal and civil cases, internal investigations, and public inquiries. However, releasing it requires careful consideration of privacy concerns, as BWCs often capture images and voices of individuals who are not involved in the incident under investigation.
The release of BWC footage is governed by a complex web of state laws, which vary significantly in their requirements for disclosure, redaction, and retention. Some states treat BWC footage as public records, subject to the same disclosure requirements as other government documents. Others have created specific exemptions for BWC footage, limiting public access to protect privacy and ensure fair trials.
Video Redaction: A Critical Tool for Protecting Privacy
Video redaction is a crucial process in fulfilling FOIA requests for police BWC footage. It involves obscuring or removing sensitive information, such as faces, license plates, and personal identifiers, to protect the privacy of individuals captured in the footage.
Redaction is necessary to comply with state laws, court orders, and ethical considerations. It helps prevent the public dissemination of sensitive information that could compromise ongoing investigations, jeopardize fair trials, or cause harm to individuals.
There are different methods of video redaction, including:
Manual Redaction: This involves manually identifying and obscuring sensitive information. It is the most time-consuming and labor-intensive method.
Automated Redaction: This utilizes software algorithms to automate the identification and redaction of sensitive information. It can significantly reduce the time and cost of redaction. Examples of such software include Veritone Redact and Secure Redact.
Partial Redaction: This involves removing specific elements, such as faces or license plates, while leaving other information intact.
Full-Frame Redaction: This obscures the entire video frame when necessary to protect sensitive information.
Challenges with Video Quality and Redaction
The quality of video footage can significantly impact the effectiveness and efficiency of the redaction process. Poor-quality videos, with issues such as low resolution, blurriness, or poor lighting, can make it challenging to accurately identify and redact sensitive information. This can lead to increased time and effort required for redaction, potentially delaying the release of footage and increasing costs.
Third-Party Video Redaction Services: A Cost-Effective Solution
Many police departments are turning to third-party video redaction service providers to handle the increasing demands of FOIA requests. These providers offer specialized expertise, advanced technology, and efficient workflows to streamline the redaction process.
Benefits of using third-party video redaction services include:
Reduced Costs: Outsourcing redaction can be more cost-effective than maintaining in-house staff and technology.
Increased Efficiency: Specialized providers can redact videos quickly and accurately, meeting tight deadlines. CaseGuard, for example, boasts a leading AI model for video redaction and works closely with clients to meet their deadlines.
Improved Accuracy: Experienced professionals ensure that redactions are precise and comply with legal requirements. Focal Forensics, for instance, takes an individualized approach to each department, adapting to their specific needs and infrastructure.
Enhanced Security: Secure data handling practices protect sensitive information throughout the redaction process.
Reduced Workload: Outsourcing frees up internal staff to focus on other priorities.
Case Studies: Police Departments Utilizing Third-Party Redaction Services
Several police departments have successfully implemented third-party video redaction services to improve their FOIA response processes. The Annapolis police department, for example, has transformed its video redaction workflow using Focal Forensics since 2017. Other departments, such as the Albuquerque Police Department and the Attorney General's office for Hawaii have reported significant improvements in efficiency and accuracy after partnering with Focal Forensics for their redaction needs.
Cost Comparison: In-House vs. Third-Party Redaction
The cost-effectiveness of using a third-party video redaction service versus in-house redaction depends on several factors, including the volume of FOIA requests, the complexity of redaction needs, and the availability of internal resources.
In-house video redaction involves costs for:
Staffing: Hiring and training personnel to perform redaction. This can include hiring new staff with specialized skills or providing extensive training to existing employees.
Software: Purchasing and maintaining video redaction software. The cost of such software can vary significantly depending on the features and capabilities.
Hardware: Upgrading computer systems to support redaction software. This can involve significant investment in new hardware and infrastructure.
Legal Advice: Consulting with legal counsel on redaction requirements. This can add to the overall cost of in-house redaction.
Furthermore, police departments in Ohio, for example, can now charge for video requests under House Bill 315 reflecting the costs associated with in-house redaction. The cost of redacting police and jail video footage can also be substantial, potentially reaching hundreds of dollars per request.
Third-party video redaction services offer a predictable cost structure, often with per-minute or per-video pricing. This can be more cost-effective for departments with limited resources or fluctuating workloads.
Staffing Requirements for In-House Video Redaction
Establishing an effective in-house video redaction program requires careful consideration of staffing needs. The Department of Justice (DOJ) emphasizes the importance of having dedicated personnel with the necessary skills and training to handle video redaction. This may involve hiring new staff with specialized expertise in video editing and redaction techniques or providing extensive training to existing FOIA staff.
Legal and Ethical Concerns with Third-Party Redaction
While third-party video redaction services offer numerous benefits, there are also potential legal and ethical concerns to consider:
Data Security: Ensuring the confidentiality and security of sensitive information when using a third-party provider. It is crucial to select providers with robust security measures and a commitment to data protection.
Chain of Custody: Maintaining a clear chain of custody for video evidence to ensure its admissibility in court. This requires careful documentation and tracking of the redaction process.
Accuracy and Completeness: Ensuring that redactions are accurate and do not obscure or remove important information. This requires thorough review and quality control procedures.
Transparency: Maintaining transparency in the redaction process and providing clear documentation of redaction decisions. This helps build public trust and ensures accountability.
Bias and Manipulation: Preventing the potential for bias or manipulation of video evidence by a third-party provider. It is essential to select providers with a commitment to ethical practices and unbiased redaction.
Ethical Considerations in Video Editing and Redaction
The use of video editing and redaction technology raises important ethical considerations, particularly with the increasing reliance on artificial intelligence (AI). One concern is the potential loss of human judgment and nuance in the editing process. While AI can be a powerful tool for automating redaction, it is crucial to ensure that human oversight and ethical considerations remain central to the process.
Best Practices for FOIA Requests and Video Redaction
The DOJ has highlighted the importance of proactive planning and the availability of affordable video redaction technology in responding to FOIA requests. This underscores the need for law enforcement agencies to adopt efficient and cost-effective redaction solutions, such as those offered by third-party providers.
Recommendations for Police Departments
Develop Comprehensive BWC Policies: Establish clear policies and procedures for the use, storage, and release of BWC footage.
Train Personnel on FOIA Requirements: Ensure that staff are knowledgeable about FOIA laws and best practices for responding to requests.
Evaluate Redaction Needs: Assess the volume and complexity of redaction requests to determine the most cost-effective solution.
Choose Reputable Providers: Select third-party redaction services with a proven track record of accuracy, security, and compliance.
Maintain Oversight: Implement procedures to monitor the redaction process and ensure compliance with legal and ethical standards.
State Laws on the Release of Police BWC Footage
State laws governing the release of police BWC footage under FOIA vary widely. Some states have specific laws addressing BWC footage, while others rely on general public records laws. These laws differ in their requirements for disclosure, redaction, and retention.
To better illustrate the variations in state laws, the following table groups states based on whether they have specific BWC laws or rely on general public records laws:
States with Specific BWC Laws
State | Law | Key Provisions |
|---|---|---|
Arizona | SB1300 (2015) | BWC footage not considered a public record. Release requires balancing public need against privacy interests (27). |
Arkansas | Ark. Code Ann. § 12-6-701 | BWC footage depicting the death of a law enforcement officer is confidential. Other footage generally subject to disclosure (28). |
California | California Public Records Act | BWC footage considered a public record. Critical incident recordings must be released within 45 days (29). |
Colorado | Enhance Law Enforcement Integrity Act (2020) | Requires all local law enforcement agencies to issue body-worn cameras. Unedited footage of misconduct complaints must be released within 21 days (30). |
Connecticut | Connecticut Freedom of Information Act | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, but with specific non-disclosure requirements for certain types of recordings (31). |
Delaware | HB185 (2021) | Requires law enforcement officers to wear and use BWCs. Recordings must be retained for at least 90 days (32). |
Florida | Florida Statutes Chapter 119 | BWC footage exempt from disclosure if taken in private places or where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy (33). |
Illinois | Law Enforcement Officer-Worn Body Camera Act | BWC footage generally exempt from disclosure under FOIA, with exceptions for specific circumstances (34). |
Kentucky | Kentucky Open Records Act | BWC footage subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy and ongoing investigations. Agencies can restrict access to footage in specific cases (35). |
Louisiana | La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 40:2551 | Requires law enforcement agencies to adopt policies for BWC activation and deactivation (37). |
Michigan | MCL - Act 85 of 2017 | BWC footage exempt from disclosure if recorded in private places, with exceptions for specific circumstances (38). |
Minnesota | Minnesota Government Data Practices Act | BWC footage classified as private or nonpublic data, with specific provisions for disclosure in certain circumstances (39). |
Missouri | R.S.Mo. § 610.100 | BWC footage recorded in non-public places is confidential, with exceptions for individuals depicted in the recording (40). |
Nevada | Nevada Public Records Act | Any photograph of a peace officer, including BWC footage showing officers' faces, is confidential and exempt from disclosure under NRS 289.02541. |
New Mexico | Inspection of Public Records Act | Requires law enforcement agencies to use BWCs. Footage generally subject to disclosure, with exceptions for confidential information (43). |
North Carolina | N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1.4A | BWC footage not considered a public record. Access limited to individuals depicted in the recording and their representatives (44). |
North Dakota | North Dakota Open Records Law | BWC footage taken in private places is exempt from disclosure (45). |
Ohio | Ohio Public Records Law | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy and sensitive information (46). |
Oregon | Oregon Public Records Law | Requires law enforcement agencies to have BWC policies. Footage generally subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy (47). |
Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law | BWC footage exempt from disclosure under the Right-to-Know law (48). |
South Carolina | S.C. Code Ann. § 23-1-240 | BWC footage not considered a public record. Access limited to law enforcement and authorized individuals (49). |
Tennessee | Tennessee Public Records Act | BWC footage exempt from disclosure in certain locations, such as schools and private residences (50). |
Wyoming | Wyoming Public Records Act | BWC footage generally exempt from disclosure, with exceptions for law enforcement and individuals involved (51). |
States Relying on General Public Records Laws
State | Law | Key Provisions |
|---|---|---|
Alabama | HB289 (2023) | Does not require public disclosure of BWC footage. Law enforcement agencies have discretion to release recordings (52). |
Alaska | Alaska Public Records Act | BWC footage generally accessible to the public after criminal investigations and court cases are closed (53). |
Georgia | O.C.G.A. § 50-18-96 | BWC footage not subject to redaction requirements. Specific retention periods apply based on the nature of the recording (54). |
Hawaii | Uniform Information Practices Act | BWC recordings considered government records and subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy and investigative purposes (55). |
Idaho | Idaho Public Records Act | No specific laws governing BWC footage. General public records law applies, with exemptions for privacy and investigative needs (56). |
Indiana | Indiana Access to Public Records Act | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy and ongoing investigations (57). |
Iowa | Iowa Code Chapter 22 | BWC footage considered part of a peace officer's investigative report and generally exempt from disclosure (58). |
Kansas | Kansas Open Records Act | BWC footage considered a criminal investigation record and subject to limited disclosure (59). |
Maine | Maine Freedom of Access Act | BWC footage subject to disclosure, but with broad exemptions that could limit public access (60). |
Maryland | Maryland Public Information Act | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy and ongoing investigations (61). |
Massachusetts | Massachusetts Public Records Law | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, but with potential for exemptions to protect privacy and investigations (3). |
Mississippi | Mississippi Public Records Act | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy and ongoing investigations (62). |
Montana | Montana Right to Know Act | No specific law addressing BWC footage. General public records law applies, with potential for exemptions (63). |
Nebraska | Nebraska Public Records Act | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, but with potential for exemptions to protect privacy and investigations. |
New Hampshire | New Hampshire Right-to-Know Law | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy and ongoing investigations (64). |
New Jersey | New Jersey Open Public Records Act | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy and ongoing investigations (65). |
New York | New York Freedom of Information Law | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy and ongoing investigations (3). |
Oklahoma | Oklahoma Open Records Act | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy and ongoing investigations (66). |
Rhode Island | Rhode Island Access to Public Records Act | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, with specific regulations for use and access (67). |
South Dakota | South Dakota Sunshine Law | No specific law addressing BWC footage. General public records law applies, with potential for exemptions (68). |
Texas | Texas Public Information Act | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, with exceptions for ongoing investigations and privacy concerns (69). |
Utah | Utah Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy and ongoing investigations (70). |
Vermont | Vermont Public Records Act | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy and sensitive information (71). |
Virginia | Virginia Freedom of Information Act | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy and ongoing investigations (72). |
Washington | Washington Public Records Act | BWC footage considered a public record, with exceptions for privacy and ongoing investigations (73). |
West Virginia | West Virginia Freedom of Information Act | BWC footage generally subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy and ongoing investigations (74). |
Wisconsin | Wisconsin Open Records Law | BWC footage subject to disclosure, with exceptions for privacy and sensitive information (75). |
Pricing of Third-Party Video Redaction Services
Pricing for third-party video redaction services varies depending on the provider, the length of the footage, the complexity of the redaction requirements, and the turnaround time. Some providers offer per-minute pricing, while others have tiered pricing based on the volume of footage.
Provider | Pricing Model |
|---|---|
Focal Forensics | Pricing based on the length of footage, no subscription fees or complexity tiers. |
Secure Redact | Monthly subscription with tiered pricing based on usage. |
Vidizmo | Offers various plans with different features and pricing. |
Fast Redaction | Per-video pricing with subscriptions. |
Digital Attic | Pricing based on the length of footage and complexity of redaction. |
Conclusion
FOIA requests for police BWC footage present significant challenges for law enforcement agencies. Video redaction is a critical tool for protecting privacy while fulfilling these requests. Third-party video redaction services offer a cost-effective and efficient solution for many departments, helping them reduce costs, improve accuracy, enhance security, and reduce workload. However, it is essential to carefully consider legal and ethical concerns and to implement best practices to ensure responsible and transparent use of this technology.
As technology continues to evolve, the use of BWCs and the demand for video evidence are likely to increase. This will necessitate ongoing adaptation of FOIA legislation and redaction practices to strike a balance between transparency and privacy. By embracing technological advancements and adhering to ethical guidelines, law enforcement agencies can leverage BWC footage and video redaction to enhance accountability, build public trust, and ensure fair and just outcomes in the justice system.
Works cited
1. Police Accountability and Video Redaction Software Programs - CaseGuard, accessed January 13, 2025, https://caseguard.com/articles/video-redaction-and-police-transparency/
2. Building Processes for Body-Worn Camera Video FOIA Requests - Granicus, accessed January 13, 2025, https://granicus.com/blog/building-processes-for-body-worn-camera-video-foia-requests/
3. Police Body Camera Policies: Retention and Release | Brennan Center for Justice, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/police-body-camera-policies-retention-and-release
4. An Overview of Video Redaction- A Quick Guide, accessed January 13, 2025, https://reduct.video/blog/video-redaction/
5. Video and Audio Redaction Resources - Focal Forensics, accessed January 13, 2025, https://focalforensics.com/audio-video-redaction-resources
6. Redacting Videos - MyAxon, accessed January 13, 2025, https://my.axon.com/s/article/Redacting-Videos
7. Redaction in the Digital Age: Here's What You Need to Know - Veritone, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.veritone.com/blog/redaction-in-the-digital-age-heres-what-you-need-to-know/
8. Unveiling the New Face of Redaction: Automating Bodycam Video Footage for Public Records in Law Enforcement - Veritone, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.veritone.com/blog/unveiling-the-new-face-of-redaction-automating-bodycam-video-footage-for-public-records-in-law-enforcement/
9. Video Redaction Services for US Law Enforcement - SecureRedact, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.secureredact.ai/us-law-enforcement
10. Issues That Can Arise When Redacting Low Quality Videos - CaseGuard, accessed January 13, 2025, https://caseguard.com/articles/redaction-issues-with-poor-quality-videos/
11. 10 years of video redaction: Unveiling the lessons learned - Police1, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.police1.com/police-products/video-redaction-software/articles/10-years-of-video-redaction-unveiling-the-lessons-learned-VKbeED8X6CtVeOYU/
12. Private Video Redaction Company - Secure, Private, Confidential - Digital Attic, accessed January 13, 2025, https://digitalattic.com/service/video-redaction-services/
13. Expert Redaction Services for Maximum Privacy Protection & Compliance - CaseGuard, accessed January 13, 2025, https://caseguard.com/redaction-services/
14. Redaction Services - Focal Forensics, accessed January 13, 2025, https://focalforensics.com/redaction-services
15. FastRedaction.com | World's Best Video Redaction, accessed January 13, 2025, https://fastredaction.com/
16. Redaction for Law Enforcement - CaseGuard, accessed January 13, 2025, https://caseguard.com/use-cases/law-enforcement/
17. Best Practices for Video Redaction - Department of Justice, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/archives/oip/best-practices-video-redaction
18. Best Practices for Video Redaction - Sighthound Redactor, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.redactor.com/blog/best-practices-for-video-redaction
19. Public Records Language to Allow Police Departments to Charge for Production of Bodycam Videos - Roetzel & Andress, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.ralaw.com/media/insights/Public%20Law%20Alert/public_records_language_to_allow_police_departments_to_charge_for_production_of_bodycam_videos
20. New law allows police departments to charge for body and dash camera video requests, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.wtol.com/article/news/local/ohio/new-law-allows-police-to-charge-for-body-and-dash-camera-video-requests/512-76c9310d-1d61-4877-b81e-b3df6521d66c
21. Ohio Law Allows Fees for Police Video Access | Perigon, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.perigon.io/news/politics/2025/01/03/ohio-lawmakers-approve-fees-police-video-access
22. From the DOJ to you: what do US agencies need to know about video redaction?, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.secureredact.ai/datapolicies/from-the-doj-to-you-what-do-us-agencies-need-to-know-about-video-redaction
23. Ethics in Video Editing: The Do's and Don'ts of Manipulating Reality - Lightworks, accessed January 13, 2025, https://lwks.com/blog/ethics-in-video-editing-the-dos-and-donts-of-manipulating-reality
24. Help With Wording An Open Records Request : r/foia - Reddit, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/foia/comments/1avp0j2/help_with_wording_an_open_records_request/
25. Body Cameras and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) - Spesia & Taylor, accessed January 13, 2025, https://spesia-taylor.com/body-cameras-and-freedom-of-information-act-foia/
26. Body and Dash-Mounted Cameras | FOIA and State Public Records Requests - CaseGuard, accessed January 13, 2025, https://caseguard.com/articles/body-and-dash-mounted-cameras-foia-and-state-public-records-requests/
27. SB1300 - 521R - S Ver - Arizona Legislature, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/52leg/1r/bills/sb1300s.htm
28. 14. Police video (e.g, body camera footage, dashcam videos) Archives, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.rcfp.org/open-government-sections/14-police-video/
29. California's Police Body Camera Law: What You Need to Know - James M Crawford, accessed January 13, 2025, https://crawford.law/californias-police-body-camera-law-what-you-need-to-know/
30. Body Worn Cameras - Colorado Division of Criminal Justice, accessed January 13, 2025, https://dcj.colorado.gov/body-worn-cameras
31. Disclosure of Body Camera Recordings - Connecticut General Assembly, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.cga.ct.gov/2022/rpt/pdf/2022-R-0164.pdf
32. Legislation Document - Delaware General Assembly, accessed January 13, 2025, https://legis.delaware.gov/json/BillDetail/GenerateHtmlDocument?legislationId=68616&legislationTypeId=1&docTypeId=2&legislationName=HB185
33. How Can I Access Florida Police Body-Camera Videos? - First Amendment Coalition, accessed January 13, 2025, https://firstamendmentcoalition.org/asked-and-answered/how-can-i-access-florida-police-body-camera-videos/
34. Public Access Opinion 19-001 | IASB - Illinois Association of School Boards, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.iasb.com/policy-services-and-school-law/court-decisions-listing/disclosure-of-officer-worn-body-camera/
35. Louisville's new body cam policy violates open records law and subverts its intent | KOGC, accessed January 13, 2025, https://kyopengov.org/blog/louisvilles-new-body-cam-policy-violates-open-records-law-and-subverts-its-intent
36. HB 373 Body Cameras - The Kentucky Association of Counties, accessed January 13, 2025, https://kaco.org/articles/hb-373-body-cameras/
37. Louisiana Revised Statutes § 40:40:2551 - Use of body-worn cameras - Justia Law, accessed January 13, 2025, https://law.justia.com/codes/louisiana/revised-statutes/title-40/rs-40-2551/
38. Michigan Sets Privacy Standards In The Law Enforcement Body- Worn Camera Privacy Act. Better Know The Victim's Rights Act and, accessed January 13, 2025, https://mml.org/insurance/risk_resources/publications/leaf_newsletter/2017_09.pdf
39. Body Camera Data / Data Practices Office - Minnesota.gov, accessed January 13, 2025, https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/data/types/body-camera/
40. Missouri Revises Its Sunshine Law to Address Mobile Video Recordings - Lewis Rice LLC, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.lewisrice.com/publications/missouri-revises-its-sunshine-law-to-address-mobile-video-recordings/
41. LVMPD > Records > Body-Worn Camera Video, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.bwcscorecard.org/static/policies/2016-08-17%20Las%20Vegas%20-%20BWC%20Video%20Request%20Policy.pdf
42. Nevada Public Records Act (NPRA) - Attorney General, accessed January 13, 2025, https://ag.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/agnvgov/Content/Issues/Public%20Records%20NPRA%20Training%20Slides%202023(1).pdf
43. New Mexico Statutes Chapter 29. Law Enforcement § 29-1-18 - Codes - FindLaw, accessed January 13, 2025, https://codes.findlaw.com/nm/chapter-29-law-enforcement/nm-st-sect-29-1-18/
44. Police Camera Footage Will No Longer Be Made Public In North Carolina, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.nfoic.org/blogs/police-camera-footage-will-no-longer-be-made-public-north-carolina/
45. State Law Enforcement Body Camera Policies - Epic.org, accessed January 13, 2025, https://epic.org/state-law-enforcement-body-camera-policies/
46. Ohio body-worn camera law strikes balance between privacy and transparency - Police1, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.police1.com/legal/articles/ohio-body-worn-camera-law-strikes-balance-between-privacy-and-transparency-PUXoeVe66EgeAzs3/
47. Recommendations for Oregon Law Enforcement Body Camera Policies, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.aclu-or.org/sites/default/files/field_documents/acluor_body_camera_policy_recommendations.pdf
48. SB 560 | Police-worn body cameras - ACLU Pennsylvania, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.aclupa.org/en/legislation/sb-560-police-worn-body-cameras
49. SUMMARY OF SOUTH CAROLINA'S POLICE BODY CAMERA LAW, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.cga.ct.gov/2015/rpt/2015-R-0159.htm
50. Body camera public record exemption needs update for more accountability - Tennessee Coalition for Open Government, accessed January 13, 2025, https://tcog.info/body-camera-public-record-exemption-needs-update-for-more-accountability/
51. Report Body-Worn Camera Laws Database - National Conference of State Legislatures, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.ncsl.org/civil-and-criminal-justice/body-worn-camera-laws-database
52. New Ala. law on police body camera videos does not require public disclosure - Police1, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.police1.com/body-camera/articles/new-ala-law-on-police-body-camera-videos-does-not-require-public-disclosure-g8Rjh947tUsnL3eA/
53. Bodycam - Comm - Alaska Department of Public Safety, accessed January 13, 2025, https://dps.alaska.gov/Comm/Bodycam
54. Georgia Code § 50-18-96 (2023) - Retention of video recordings from law enforcement sources; destruction, accessed January 13, 2025, https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/title-50/chapter-18/article-5/section-50-18-96/
55. Open Government Guide Hawaii - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.rcfp.org/open-government-guide/hawaii/
56. Open Government Guide Idaho - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.rcfp.org/open-government-guide/idaho/
57. Transparency in Policing - Vigo County Sheriff, accessed January 13, 2025, https://vigosheriff.in.gov/department/index.php?structureid=36
58. 22AO:0002 Body Camera Footage and Investigative Reports | Iowa Public Information Board, accessed January 13, 2025, https://ipib.iowa.gov/body-camera-footage
59. Kansas Statutes Chapter 45. Public Records, Documents and Information § 45-254 - Codes - FindLaw, accessed January 13, 2025, https://codes.findlaw.com/ks/chapter-45-public-records-documents-and-information/ks-st-sect-45-254/
60. Maine Law May Exempt Police Body Camera Footage from Public Records, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.govtech.com/policy/maine-law-may-exempt-police-body-camera-footage-public-records.html
61. POLICY CHANGES 2024 3. Body Worn Camera - Cumberland, MD, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.ci.cumberland.md.us/DocumentCenter/View/4857/POLICY-CHANGES-2024
62. Title 25, Chapter 61, Public Access to Public Records | Mississippi Ethics Commission, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.ethics.ms.gov/thepublicrecordact
63. Open Government Guide Montana - Reporters Committee, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.rcfp.org/open-government-guide/montana/
64. Law Enforcement Records Under the Right-to-Know law | New Hampshire Municipal Association, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.nhmunicipal.org/town-city-article/law-enforcement-records-under-right-know-law
65. Republican bill would restrict disclosure of police body camera recordings in N.J., require consent of each subject in footage (Updated) - The Jersey Vindicator, accessed January 13, 2025, https://jerseyvindicator.org/2023/12/28/n-j-republican-bill-would-restrict-the-disclosure-of-police-body-cam-recordings-require-consent-of-each-subject-in-footage/
66. New Oklahoma Open Records Laws Expand Public Right to Know - Wirth Law Office - Tulsa, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.wirthlawoffice.com/tulsa-attorney-blog/2014/11/new-oklahoma-laws-expand-public-right-know
67. police body cameras - State of Rhode Island General Assembly, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.rilegislature.gov/pressrelease/_layouts/RIL.PressRelease.ListStructure/Forms/DisplayForm.aspx?List=c8baae31-3c10-431c-8dcd-9dbbe21ce3e9&ID=371908
68. Open Government Guide South Dakota - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.rcfp.org/open-government-guide/south-dakota/
69. How to request body worn camera video - AustinTexas.gov, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Body%20Camera%20ORR_2020.pdf
70. Public Record Request – SLCPD - SLC.gov, accessed January 13, 2025, https://police.slc.gov/resources/grama-records-request/
71. Model Body Worn Camera Policy - Vermont Criminal Justice Council, accessed January 13, 2025, http://vcjc.vermont.gov/content/model-body-worn-camera-policy
72. How Police Body Cameras Play a Role in Personal Injury Cases - Northern Virginia Injury Law News, accessed January 13, 2025, https://northernvirginia.legalexaminer.com/legal/how-police-body-cameras-play-a-role-in-personal-injury-cases/
73. The Police, Body Cameras, and Privacy in Washington State, accessed January 13, 2025, https://jsis.washington.edu/news/the-police-body-cameras-and-privacy-in-washington-state/
74. West Virginia, Public Information, Data Protection - CaseGuard, accessed January 13, 2025, https://caseguard.com/articles/the-west-virginia-foia-and-data-security-regulations/
75. 165.87(3)(c)1. - Wisconsin Legislature, accessed January 13, 2025, https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/165.87(3)(c)1.
76. Video Redaction Pricing - SecureRedact, accessed January 13, 2025, https://www.secureredact.ai/pricing
77. Redaction Pricing | Buy VIDIZMO Online Today, accessed January 13, 2025, https://vidizmo.com/redaction-pricing/
